A historic article. It wasn't illustrated when I acquired it, although it likely was in the original. I add three of Sewell's drawings of Buff Cochins, taken from the 1898 Reliable Poultry Journal's compilation, The Asiatics:
An Ideal Cochin Female Shape, comprising the best points of several live models. |
An Ideal Cochin Male Shape, comprising the best points of several live models. |
BUFF COCHINS OF TWENTY
YEARS AGO
By F.L.Sewell (1912)
ARTIST SEWELL CONTRIBUTES
A NEW CHAPTER TO
THE HISTORY OF THE BUFF COCHIN IN AMERICA AND PRESENTS SOME PICTURES OF OLD WINNERS THAT WILL BE A WELCOME ADDITION TO THEIR PICTORIAL HISTORY—FOR MORE THAN HALF A CENTURY BUFF COCHINS HAVE BEEN BRED IN ENGLAND AND THEY PLAYED AN IMPORTANT PART THERE IN EXCITING INTEREST IN POULTRY SHOWS AND THOROUGHBRED POULTRY—THE SENSATIONAL EXHIBITION OF FULL-FEATHERED ENGLISH BUFF COCHINS AT MADISON SQUARE GARDEN TWENTY YEARS AGO—THERE USED TO BE CLASSES FOR “AMERICAN” AND “FULL-FEATHERED” BUFFS—THEIR EXTREME SHORTNESS OF LEGS IS DUE TO BREEDING TO AMERICAN IDEALS—WHY NOT BREED A HAPPY MEDIUM TYPE—HOW TO YARD, HOUSE AND COOP SHOW SPECIMENS TO PRESERVE THEIR TOE AND LEG FEATHERING—CHANGES IN STYLE—AN IMPORTANT IMPORTATION
THE HISTORY OF THE BUFF COCHIN IN AMERICA AND PRESENTS SOME PICTURES OF OLD WINNERS THAT WILL BE A WELCOME ADDITION TO THEIR PICTORIAL HISTORY—FOR MORE THAN HALF A CENTURY BUFF COCHINS HAVE BEEN BRED IN ENGLAND AND THEY PLAYED AN IMPORTANT PART THERE IN EXCITING INTEREST IN POULTRY SHOWS AND THOROUGHBRED POULTRY—THE SENSATIONAL EXHIBITION OF FULL-FEATHERED ENGLISH BUFF COCHINS AT MADISON SQUARE GARDEN TWENTY YEARS AGO—THERE USED TO BE CLASSES FOR “AMERICAN” AND “FULL-FEATHERED” BUFFS—THEIR EXTREME SHORTNESS OF LEGS IS DUE TO BREEDING TO AMERICAN IDEALS—WHY NOT BREED A HAPPY MEDIUM TYPE—HOW TO YARD, HOUSE AND COOP SHOW SPECIMENS TO PRESERVE THEIR TOE AND LEG FEATHERING—CHANGES IN STYLE—AN IMPORTANT IMPORTATION
BY
FRANKLANE L. SEWELL
The magnificent race of Buff
Cochins has always attracted popular admiration, ever since the ‘hen fever
days” of more than half a century ago, when her majesty, Queen Victoria, took a
genuine interest and pride in them at her own aviaries. About that time they
did more to encourage interest in poultry exhibitions in England than did
any other race of domestic fowl, and what were then considered fabulous prices
were paid for them. At the beginning of the ‘90’s, when the new Madison Square
Garden opened its arena to America’s greatest poultry exhibition, the Cochins
enjoyed another boom. The full-feathered Buff Cochins of England being attractively
exhibited, created a genuine sensation and became the popular aristocrats of
the show for several succeeding seasons. Some of the older fanciers will
recall what big prices were paid to English breeders to tempt them to part with
their finest show birds and how garlands of roses and carnations festooned the
winners that captured the leading prize ribbons. An interesting era in Cochin
history In America is recalled when turning over old numbers of New York show
catalogues. In 1892, all Buff Cochins competed simply as “Buff Cochins”. The
incoming of numerous full-feathered Cochins from England the following winter
prompted Madison Square Garden show managers to arrange two divisions for Buff
Cochins; one for “American” and another for “Full-feathered”. At that show, February,
1893, there were 52 Buff Cochins in the American single classes and 48 in the
full-feathered single classes. Exhibition pens competed together. This rule of
staging the Buff Cochins in two divisions was continued until 1896. Since then
all Buff Cochins have been staged in one division. In 1892 the greatest
collection of full-feathered Buff Cochins that had ever left England were
purchased at an expense of $1,625.00. The collection consisted of three
cockerels at $200 each, five pullets at $125 each, two cocks at $75 each and
five hens at $50 each. The old birds had been sold by the expert, who bred them
for sums similar to those paid for the young birds, to a well-to-do amateur,
who valued them at $500 each, but on going abroad he parted with them at the more
moderate prices. One of the cockerels and one of the pullets are illustrated
herewith, see Fig. 1 and Fig. 2. The cock bird, “Wonder”, Fig. 6, was one of these cockerels that won second
as cockerel and first as cock at New York.
This
collection included the most magnificent specimens that England ever produced
and were all of one blood line that came from a yard that produced the purest
colored birds of the truest, most imposing Cochin type. This superb team won
all but one first prize in the winter of 1893, and in February, 1894. The young
birds produced from matings of the fowls from this collection won all firsts
and all seconds competed for, assuring our American fanciers that nothing finer
could be obtained. They were, in fact, the grandest full-fearhered Buff Cochins
of that period. This team was personally selected for the yards of Adams,
Perdue and Young; on account of the special fancy and enterprise of Thomas
Young, a wholesale florist of New York.
At
this time many fine full-feathered Buff Cochins were also imported by Sharp
Brothers, of Massachusetts, and by Dr. J. J. Hare, of Canada. These
importations of England’s best made further importations unnecessary, but
American breeders have bent their energies toward selecting and modifying these
wonderful Cochins to American ideals. The best American Buff Cochins up to 1890
were much inferior in exhibition qualities to the best full-feathered birds
Imported from England. Since then the principal change that can be noticed,
effected to please the American conception of a Cochin, is the shortening of
the legs. American fanciers have always had the idea that sufficient length of
legs to give height to the bird detracts from their ideal of a globular form.
This in a large degree is true. However, it must be remembered that without
sufficient length of thigh and surface of leg muscles, the greatest length of
side fluff with leg and toe feathering can hardly be attained. The two imported
English males illustrated herewith, (See Fig. 3 ), had feathering extending
from the feet 8 inches in length. They were not the progenitors of handy
barn-yard scratchers, but were a show themselves that would bring joy to the
heart of any proud fancier who loves to see such a display of golden magnificence stride across
his lawn or pose majestically before admiring visitors of poultry exhibitions.
CHANGES
IN COCHIN STYLE
For
several years, following the importations of full-feathered English Buff
Cochins from 1890 to 1893, the ruling fashion was for “full feather”. Some of
those first profusely feathered birds were immense in appearance. As we noted
elsewhere, the very largest quantity and length of thigh, fluff and leg and
toe feather seemed to demand a type of Cochin with considerable length of leg,
and while the fashion for extreme length of feather prevailed, the ideal of
roundness in the Cochin type was somewhat distorted. The cock imported by
Sharp Brothers and shown at Boston in 1898, see Fig. 3), well illustrates the
extraordinary quantity of plumage that was developed on this section of the
bird, provided the bird had it in his blood and had sufficient surface upon
which it could grow. We show two hens, Fig. 5, exhibited at New York and
Boston, 1903 and 1904, also a cock and hen exhibited about 1904, see Fig. 4.
In
1907, at Boston, they exhibited another cock (also imported), that showed a
change toward the present fashion of roundness with the plumage more equally
distributed throughout the sections. The bird was broader in proportion to its
height and the legs were no longer than necessary to move himself about handily
and with a degree of dignity in his pose. A comparison of these two cocks quite
clearly illustrates the change of type effected from the beginning of the ‘90’s
to 1907.
Long
legs in the Cochin, even to gain the extreme length of leg and toe feather,
never seem to rule long in Cochin fashion. As some fanciers of the breed
express it, “They do not like to see much daylight underneath the Cochin.” The
extreme in shortness has also been developed, and while as a show room
curiosity its appearance excites comment and occasionally may even win ribbons,
such extremes do not remain popular long. Such specimens do not move about
freely—often they become very lazy and inactive. There is a happy medium for
the ideal type of Cochin, one that will not be too coarse and slow to mature or
indisposed to forage, but one that will preserve all the vitality of the
ancient Asiatic and prove, as they have with some fanciers who study their
proper management, to be productive and profitable as well as exceedingly
showy. Those who have watched the development of several of the popular, large
Buff varieties that the past twenty years have brought forth, realize what a
large degree of success in attaining the new Buff varieties must be credited
to that ancient prepotent blood of this very old Oriental race with its stamina
and vigor of constitution and its tendency to clear buff color.
CARE
OF SHOW SPECIMENS
It may interest those now rearing full-feathered Cochins to
recall a few things we observed at the successful yards we visited in Heiston,
England, in the autumn and again in the winter of 1892 while selecting the team
of Cochins for Thomas Young, Jr. Many fanciers who have bred in their yards the
full-feathered Cochins with the ambition of exhibiting them at the winter
shows, have discovered to their disappointment, that a large part of the great
wealth of feathering that grows outward from the feet and toes of the most
excessively plumaged specimens and that would, if all turned out well, make the
most sensational show birds, is broken off. The best show Cochins seldom reach
the show pens in full possession of all the feathers that developed on them,
simply because they were allowed to be lost. Why pay the price for stock that
will develop sensational show points and select and breed and feed to increase
this stock and its show qualities after it is obtained, and then house and yard
these magnificent fowls in such a manner that their fine feathers will be
crushed and broken and lost? Herewith is presented a simple device (see Fig. 7
) that proved effective at the Heiston yards to keep birds from crushing the
fluff and toe feathering against the walls and fences and against the sides of
the houses. It is a light bracket fastened to the fence or wall, that extends
out about six inches, and it supports a round, slender, hard-wood rod at about
the height of the middle of a full-grown fowl’s wing. This prevents the birds
from crushing the long fluff and foot feathers against walls and fences.
Another place where Cochins crush their plumage is when roosting on the perches
at night against the wall, if the roosts extend there for support. Often they
crush their long fluff against each other when several are allowed to use the
same perch. Besides this we have seen cases where mice had crawled up on the
perch where show specimens were roosting and bitten from the birds and carried
away quantities of fluff with which to build their nests.
On
account of these experiences Mr. Harris had made individual perches for his
best show Cochins. (See Fig. 8). These were simply flat boards about six inches
wide and one foot long fastened to stakes that were driven into the earthen
floor and which extended about one foot high. He did not bed his exhibition
birds on straw or any litter of that sort and he called attention to the fact
that scratching would rapidly break and wear away the plumage from the legs and
feet. His object was to produce and protect every feather that nature allowed.
He put emphasis on the constant necessity of protection of fancy points when
they were so valuable to show room competition.
In these yards the Cochins spent the several weeks of their
final development and conditioning inside cool , airy houses. Each of his best
birds had a separate partitioned pen of four by six or seven feet floor space.
The light was modified by white-washing the moderate sized windows. This care
was taken so that direct sun rays should not fade out the richness of color.
The floor of these individual pens was earth, loosely pulverized and perfectly dry to a depth of six or more
inches. This earth I noticed was very light in weight. It was a dark grayish
sand and dry as if finely ground peat had been worked into it. When I first saw
the place, some of the best birds were wallowing in it, enjoying a genuine dust
bath. I inquired if it did not injure the feathers or the color of the plumage
and my attention was called to the lightness and dryness of it. Mr. Harris said
that that kind of “earth” did not injure them. Apparently their condition was
improving while kept upon it. These birds, it must be borne in mind, were being
expressly kept and conditioned for exhibition. They were reared in yards about
one-half shaded by trees for the restful comfort of the birds and to prevent
fading of the plumage. The yards were mostly covered with short-cut green turf.
No rubbish or anything of like nature was allowed about that in any way could
break or injure the plumage. No one ever passed or entered the pens that would
frighten or induce the fowls to run. I asked if it was considered beneficial to
the strength and vitality of the stock to rear the young birds for the first
few months of their lives on a more free open range where they would be tempted
to run and take more vigorous exercise than in the rather restricted quarter
acre. He assured me that they never wanted to see birds in plumage go faster
than a brisk walk,
His birds were very large and he wanted their full, excessive
plumage to impress the beholder with their immense size. His constant aim was
to develop the birds’ plumage so as to increase that impression. He wished to
have every feather grow outward to allow the fluffy undercoat to expand and
increase the “roundness.”
“Fowls
that hold their plumage close from whatever cause never appear so large as
those that develop fluffy outstanding feathers, even when they are little,
newly-hatched chicks,” he went on to explain. “When it becomes necessary to
catch them, we avoid placing the hands around them closely, from the upper
side, but lift them from underneath only steadying them from the top. We take
the greatest of care never to cause fright in a little chick any more than in
an older one. We fear that if a bird gets in the habit of contracting its
plumage that it will cause it to grow ‘tighter’ in feather. Loose, open,
straight-out fluff we must have from start to finish if our Cochins are to fill
the coop and appear the biggest possible.“When we take them up to the Palace
show we get them into their pens the night before judging day so they will have
plenty of time to settle down, spread out and feel perfectly at ease. A scared
Cochin becomes a tight-feathered Cochin. We stay with our birds and see that
no one touches them with a ‘judging stick.’ A tap of the judging stick makes a
Cochin draw in its plumage and look an inch or more smaller, and believe me, I
do everything possible to develop them and keep them as big as I can, for that
goes a long way toward success in showing Cochins.” When this team of Cochins
were sent to the Cunard Steamship “Etruna,” on which I returned with them, Mr.
Harris had special hampers made of good, strong willow, upon the inner sides of
which were additional bent frames of light, springy willow that kept the birds
several inches away from the sides and allowed the long foot feathering to
extend so that very little of that immense growth was broken. (See Fig. 9).
This unstinted care was expensive, but it went a long way toward preserving
these beautiful, full-feathered Cochins in all their magnificent plumage for
their truly sensational appearance in New York when full-feathered English
Buff Cochins were the leading attraction at Madison Square Garden twenty years
ago.
No comments:
Post a Comment